CMC Home Kravis Home Leadership Review Home

Mission

Editorial Board

Kravis Leadership
Institute

Claremont
McKenna
College

Contact Us

Call for Papers








 ISSN: 1539-6363            Issue: Vol. 4, Summer 2004
Emergent Leadership: Case Study of a Jury Foreperson

By Joseph L. Curtin, California State University, Northridge

American justice revolves around a jury of one's peers. How do leaders emerge among the members of a jury? What behaviors can influence the emergence of formal or informal leaders as jury deliberations progress?
[More]
p. 75


A Social-Cognitive Model of Leadership: Open Systems Theory at the Individual Level of Analysis

By B. Alan Echtenkamp, Ph.D., Kravis Leadership Institute, Claremont McKenna College

Traditional studies of leadership have often explored the traits of leaders or the situations in which they find themselves. Open Systems Theory is a theoretical framework that allows us to describe person-situation interactions at multiple levels of analysis. The application of open systems frameworks to leadership represents a larger movement in the sciences to represent phenomena as nonlinear dynamic systems.
[More]
p. 89



Follower Developmental Characteristics as Predicting Transformational Leadership: A Longitudinal Field Study

Original publication by Taly Dvir and Boas Shamir
In The Leadership Quarterly

Synopsis by Maggie Fromm, Claremont McKenna College '06

The focus of transformational leadership is usually on the leader and the leader's efforts to empower and develop the followers. Dvir and Shamir address the follower's level of development at the start of the relationship. Does the follower's initial level of development actually influence whether the leader's style will be perceived as transformational?
[ More ]
p. 105



Entrepreneurial Leadership: Developing and Measuring a Cross-Cultural Construct

Original publication by Vipin Gupta, Ian C. MacMillan and Gita Surie
In Journal of Business Venturing

Synopsis by Adele Bergstrom '05, Leadership Review Editorial Assistant

The authors endorse the universal understanding of entrepreneurial leadership, yet posit differences in its perceived effectiveness across cultures, and in situations of varying degrees of business competition.
[ More ]
p. 103



Current Issue

Past Issues


E-mail this page